|
The Fall of Gruit and the Rise of Brewer's Droop |
|
By Stephen Harrod Buhner |
|
Written 1999 |
|
It would have been inconceivable to our ancestors that gruit could ever be
forgotten. But ask anyone today what it is and a blank stare or a bad joke aboutgardening will be all you will get - unless for some reason you happen to ask a beer
historian. But for most of European history gruit (or sometimes grut) was what beer
was. If you went into a pub in the middle ages in most of continental Europe you would
have been served gruit. Hopped beers came much later, gaining dominance about 1750
A.D. - though gruit ale continued to be brewed in small, out-of-the-way places until
World War 2. Many people think hops became an additive to beer for its bittering and
preservative qualities but the truth is quite different. Gruit was primarily a combination of three herbs: sweet gale (Myrica gale), |
|
| According to Linneaus, it was used by the people of Lima in Dalecarnia, instead of hops, when they brewed for weddings: '. . . so that the guests become crazy.' Linneaus called the plant galentara, 'causing madness', and this plant 'which the people of Lima sometimes use in their ale stirs up the blood and makes one lose one's balance.'. . . Yarrow is in no way innocent when mixed with ale. It has a strong odour and flavour, and well deserves the name Linnaeus gave it, to indicate the frenzy that was said to result from it. (4) |
|
|
Modern scientific research has born out the fact these herbs do contain
substances that are mildly narcotic, psychotropic, or inebriating. In fact, indigenous
cultures throughout the world used these herbs for at least 60,000 years, not only for
their medicinal actions but also as mild inebriants and sexual stimulants. |
|
| In Germany, as beer historian John Arnold comments: | |
|
|
| Hops, until this time, was merely one of the plants used all along in the
production of beer - the earliest mention of its use probably being in Hildegard of
Bingen's (1098-1179) Physica Sacra. It finally gained herbal dominance in Germany (the
first place its use was legally required) nearly the same time that Martin Luther was
excommunicated by the Catholic church in 1520. This, I think, is not mere coincidence. One of the arguments of the Protestants against the Catholic clergy (and indeed of Catholicism) was Catholic self-indulgence: in food, drink, and lavish life style. And it was this Protestant outrage that was the genesis of the temperance movement. (It would not stop, of course, with the assault on gruit ales but would continue on to include ale itself and any kind of psychotropic or inebriating plants and drinks by the twentieth century.) The Protestant reformists were joined by merchants and competing royals desiring to break the brewing monopoly of the church. The result was, ultimately, the end of a many-thousand-year tradition of herbal beer making in Europe and the narrowing of beer and ale into one limited expression of beer production, that of hopped ales or what we today call beer. The majority of historical beer writers insist that this was only because (after some 10,000 years) our ancestors accidentally discovered that hops was antiseptic enough to preserve beer. Our ancestors were neither that blind nor narrow in their empiricism. Hops kept the beer from spoiling, yes, however a number of other herbs possess strong antibacterial properties and can help beer "keep." Many of those herbs were commonly used in ale, for instance wormwood and juniper. But hops possesses two characteristics notably different than the herbs it replaced - it causes the drinker to become drowsy and it diminishes sexual desire. Protestant literature of the time, denoting the "problems" associated with the gruit herbs, contradict contemporary beer historians and are in actuality some of the first drug control manifestos on record. The laws that eventually passed in the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries restricting the number of herbal additives used in brewing are actually the first drug control laws ever passed. As Nordland reveals: |
|
|
|
| The historical record is clear that hops' supplantation of other herbs was
primarily a reflection of Protestant irritation about "drugs" and the Catholic church
in concert with competing merchants trying to break a monopoly and so increase their
profits. The motivations were religious and mercantile. Reasons not so different than
the ones used to illegalize marijuana in the United States in the twentieth century.
That this occurred is regrettable. Though gruit herbs do possess mild inebriating
activities they are actually quite healthy for people when used in moderation. Though it might seem from the descriptions of the ancient writers that gruit herbs are in the same category as what we call "drugs" today they are in fact more similar in their effects to tequila than marijuana. The writers who described the dangerous effects of gruit were in fact those who wanted to outlaw their use and stop the indiscriminate use of excitants (as well as make money by being able to brew a competing product). But once hops supplanted gruit the vast majority of men throughout the western world were still being drugged by their beer only now they were being drugged into a dull, flaccid sleepiness. |
|
|
THE END |
|
| References: 1. John Arnold. Origin and History of Beer and Brewing Chicago:Alumni Association of the Wahl-Henius Institute of Fermentology, 1911, p. 239, 241. 2. Odd Nordland. Brewing and Beer Traditions in Norway, Norway:The Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities, 1969, page 216. 3. Maude Grieve. A Modern Herbal, NY:Dover, 1971, page 460. 4. Nordland. Brewing and Beer Traditions in Norway, page 223. 5. Arnold. Origin and History of Beer and Brewing, page 375. 6. ibid, page 235. 7. ibid, page 237. 8. Nordland. Brewing and Beer Traditions in Norway, page 221. 9. Dr. John Harrison and the members of the Durden Park Beer Circle. Old British Beers and How to Make Them, London:Durden Park Beer Circle, 1991, page 21. |
|